Navigation

  • What's the Guru Gonna Say Next? Subscribe now.

    RSS 2.0 | Atom 1.0 | CDF

    TopRank Reader Poll

    Search

    Categories

     

    On this page

    Why SEO Ethical Standards Won't Work.

    Archive

    Blogroll

     Achtung!
    you WILL learn better SEO
     Donna Fontenot's SEO-scoop
    Donna is just about as honest they come. I love how that comes across in her blog her
     Fantomaster. A true legend in his own time.
    One of the most intelligent men I have ever had the pleasure of knowing. And quite a looker too in that expensive suit he always wears in public
     For My Chinese SEO Friends
    Chinese SEO blogs for the Massa's
     IT Techno Update
    Techndu's managing director publishes a tutorial blog about project management
     John Scott's V7N
    John is a friend and a hoot. I love his fresh outlook on marketing and SEO
     LinkJuicy
    For some of the best linkbuilding tips and interviews on the net
    Search Engine Optimization Journal
    For their obvious good taste.
    SearchRank Blog
    David Wallace nominated me for an award and I like him !
     SEO Rock Stars
    These are just some of the people I have had the great fortune of meeting, doing business with or just read them all the time because they are either good or entertaining or both. Just do a search for any of these names. Todd Malicoat- Michael Gray- John Andrews- Ed Purkiss- Danny Sullivan - Christine Churchill - Kim Krause- Jenifer Slegg - Jason Duke - Mikkel Svendsen -Ian Mcanerin and more. I wish I could name them al
     SEOmoz
    Rand Fishkin and company is raising the bar on professional blogging and building quite a little media empire in the process. Want to build the best blog on the net? just do what the SEOmoz crew does.
     Shoemoney
    I don't know of anyone else who has lost so much and gained so much doing it. A man who puts his money where his mouth is.
     Sphinn
    Everybody is doing it!
     Superior SEO insight
    This guy can really open your eyes to the REAL seo world with every post. Excellent!
    The best search news site
    If you can only read one search news site a day searchengineland should be it. Then go Sphinn it!
     This Week in SEO
    Another cool resource to help you remain out standing in your field. Great job guys!
     Wolf-Howl
    the must read blog of a true SEO linking artist

    Disclaimer
    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

    Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

    Total Posts: 50
    This Year: 21
    This Month: 1
    This Week: 0
    Comments: 263

    Sign In

     Monday, April 21, 2008
    Monday, April 21, 2008 1:07:11 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) ( )

    Question for the Week of April 20th, 2008

    There is a discussion over at WebProWorld about setting standards for SEO.

    http://www.webproworld.com/search-engine-optimization-forum/68100-do-we-need-search-engine-optimization-standards.html

    What are you views on this, O, Mighty Guru? (I think I know, but could you tell us anyway?)


    ********************************************

    There can be no standards set for SEO anymore than there could be standards set for lawyers calling themselves, JO's, (judge optimizers), or mechanics calling themselves RO's (road optimizers), chefs calling themselves TO's (tableware optimizers), or carpenters calling themselves HO's, (hammer optimizers) or ------I could go on for a long time but I think you get the point.   

    While lawyers may have all kinds of relationships with judges and know what motivates them, they still would never call themselves judge optimizers because

    #1. that is NOT what they do

    #2. It is misleading and gives the wrong impression

    #3. It has negative connotations.

    Mechanics and chefs don't call themselves road and tableware optimizers because

    #1.While they could not perform their skills were it not for those things being understood and used well, they still have no direct control over them. They do not optimize roads or plates, they optimize cars that use roads and improve the presentation of gourmet food that gets eaten with tableware.

    #2. It is mislading and gives the wrong impression

    #3. it seems a little silly to call something you do by the name of something you do NOT do.

    Carpenters do not call themselves hammer optimizers because

    #1. The hammer is just a tool they use to get their job done. They need to possess the skills necassary to effectively make that tool do what they do better, but it still just a tool.

    #2. To call themselves a hammer optimizer glorifies the tool and belittles the carpenters skill and dedication to a craft. It makes the hammer the most important aspect of building a house when the fact is, his skill and ability enables him to use a lot of other tools to accomplish the same objective.

    #3. Carpenters do not optimze hammers, they build houses.


    SEO does not need standards because it does not exist. No one calling themselves an SEO optimizes a search engine.

    You can not get a group of people to ever agree on ethical standards by getting everyone to agree to behave a certain way when they do the thing they really don't do. That is why the term ethical SEO is a classic oxymoron. NOT because there are a lot of ways to accomplish online commerce, but because we are all arguing over something that does not exist.

    you -- I'm proud to be an ethical SEO

    them -- what does SEO stand for???

    you -- search engine optimization!

    them -- good for you. which search engines do you optimize?

    you -- well I don't actually optimize search engines. I just call it that because everyone else does.

    them -- doesn't that make you kind of an  honest liar????


    There are a lot of ways to practice law.

    There are a lot of ways to approach auto repair.

    Every chef has their own personality injected into the preparation of food

    And there must be as many ways to get a house built as there are carpenters

    Yet each of these professions have organizations that establish and encourage their membership to follow a set of ethcial standards. 

    In the Guru's mind, the online marketing industry desparately needs a professional organization but it needs to be open to

    website optimizers

    PPC experts

    usability consultants

    copywriters

    people who can effectively decipher analytics

    mobile phone and wireless marketing specialists

    ad jockeys

    public relations consultants

    split testing experts

    php, joomla, drupal, java developers that can enhance navigation and tracking

    affiliate marketers

    anyone that sells online promotional services

    link builders

    advertising agencies

    and search engine companies.

    Then you could set a code of ethics that included things like

    Honesty with clients, employees, vendors and shareholders is our foremost responsibility

    Always strive to do the most good for the most stakeholders. You, the client, the industry and the web at large

    Do what we say we will do

    Pay our dues on time


    I think that would pretty much cover the basics. From there you could make it as detailed, complex, convuluted, confusing and contradictory as you like, keeping in mind that with each detail comes increased difficulty in majority agreement but as long as 51 out of 100 voted yes, it flies and of course all that really matters is that the code enhances the image of the industry and secures that part about paying the dues on time.

    Call it something that welcomes all those different skill sets, stop calling it SEO and call it something that all of those skill sets actually do, like Online Marketing Professionals, and there could be a professional organization for the betterment of the online marketing industry within a matter of a few months.

    From there, sub groups could easily be formed,(and separate dues charged), like the PPC Specialists of America, Greater Northern European Lesbian Link Builders Association, the STDW, (split testing dudes of the World) or the Iluminaughty. It would work as long as the PSA really did PPC in America and the GNELLBA really were lesbians and the Iluminaughty really were naughty.

    My biggest pet peeve about calling the online marketing industry search engine optimization is that if gives this mystical power to search engines limiting the scope of the services and the marketing results we could all be producing. It somehow makes us all feel that search engines have too much control over us and often abuse that power when it is we ourselves that hand that power to them on a silver platter. We do NOT optimze search engines. Do you think the search engines don't understand that? The only people that seem to not understand that is our potential prospects which I personally believe would be many, MANY times larger if we just called what we do by something that actually reflected the value propositon we offer.

    As the SEO community, we can do a LOT of things for a LOT people. All of them highly value driven with very good profits margins. But instead we limit our market, we confuse our prospects and we hand the power of our skills, intelligence, education and research right into the hands of the search engines invalidating ourselves and our industry.

    Search enignes are important BUT they don't control design, navigation, effective copy and contrary to popular misconception, they don't control what or how we perform professional online marketing of which search engines are a part, but ONLY a part.

    Stop calling it what it isn't and call what it is, (trying to be as inclusive as possible), and a professional industry organization, complete with ethical standards, will soon be upon us and you could at least count on the Guru talking it up big time.


     Peace Y'all

    G




    You're gonna to have quit playin superman. You're ruinin all my good towels!